Sunday, August 5, 2012

After a pit bull murders a small child the asshole pit bull owner always says it was the kid's fault.

It's not enough to shoot the pit bull. The owner deserves the same treatment.

Fatal Pit Bull Attacks

The rest of this post is a copy and paste job from www.ridingmagazine.com:

California Riding Magazine • August, 2010
Mauled, Mutilated or Dead?
by Joy Bruce
How many more family pets, children, people or livestock need to be mauled, mutilated or killed before we legislate a separate classification of dogs who have been bred to kill? Dogs that have been bred to kill such as Pit Bulls, Rottweilers, Presa Canarios and their mixes comprise approximately 68% of all deaths. This is not an accident, it is in their blood.
The sad facts are these types of dogs were created by mankind to kill. Like it or not, it remains the essence of the dog. Though they may be sweet to their owners, they are still “hard-wired” to kill. Owners of these dogs argue that if properly socialized and trained, these dogs make great companions and do not pose any more risk than any other breed. That is the argument of “nature versus nurture.” I submit both will be expressed by the dog at some point in it’s lifetime. After all, if breeding for certain characteristics didn’t work, we wouldn’t do it.
An owner can make a dog very obedient while under their control but can not erase it’s heritage by socializing or training. These owners would have you believe that it would be surprising that once escaped and around livestock, a Border Collie was herding the livestock! You can not socialize nor train the herding instinct away. Border Collies are hard wired to herd just like Bully breeds are hard-wired to kill.
To clarify the meaning of the word “dangerous,” it’s a thing, activity, dog or person that should be considered “dangerous” if it or he presents an unacceptably high risk of serious injury, even before causing harm. If cars, plastic bags, electrical cords and other mundane objects are considered dangerous to some degree because of their potential for harm, not their individual history of crashing, suffocating or electrocuting, why not this assumption of dogs whose heritage is bred to kill?
The issue is not whether that particular dog will ever bite, but whether it presents too great a risk for serious injury – not because of what it has done, but because of what others in it’s class have done and the individual is capable of/bred to do. Defining serious injury is needed also. The bites of a teacup-sized dog and retrieving or herding dogs (whose mouths are designed to seize and guide as opposed to crush and rip) do not present the risk of serious injury inherent in the bites of dogs which were bred to kill. The pounds per square inch in the bite of a Shepherd type dog is around 185 lbs. Compare that with a Bully type dog bred to kill, like a Pit Bull, who’s bite is around 540 lbs per sq inch!
The fact remains that if almost any other dog has a ‘BAD moment,’ someone may get bitten, but will not be maimed for life or killed. If a dog bred to kill has a ‘BAD moment,’ often someone is maimed for life or killed – and that creates an off-the-chart risk.
To argue that it is the owners fault not the dog’s fault is always true but hardly comforting. The dogs' potential to harm rests in the hands of it’s owner. In the case of dogs bred to kill, that is a very dangerous situation because they are treated legally the same as a dog bred to retrieve or herd etc. It is like having the same laws for keeping a wolf as for a collie. The dogs mankind has bred to kill and their victims pay the heaviest price with their well being or life.
In my experience, few people have trained their dogs for “re-call and out” (come back & stop chase/attack) under stressful or tempting situations on and off-leash. An obedient dog in the show ring or in the home seems to lose all its training when tempted or triggered by something or someone. Realistically, all dogs escape their back yards, homes or leashes at some time or another, and in this situation the owners have very little if any control. How safe do you feel?
The reality is most people CAN NOT STOP in MID-CHASE, their Poodle/Collie/Labrador/Blue Heeler/Jack Russell or whatever breed from chasing/attacking a cat/other dogs/chickens/livestock/people in uniform/a child on a bicycle or a car etc. People who own Bully type dogs bred to kill are no different, but their dogs are. Your safety rests in their hands!
Given this reality, it is illogical and unacceptable to expect people to be comforted by being told that the death of their child or family pet or horse was because the owner wasn’t responsible.
Why is it that keeping wolves/cougars as pets is banned? I submit it’s partly because of the inherent nature of the wolf/cougar to kill presents too high a risk, even if they are very sweet with their owners and hand raised from a baby. Why then are dogs bred to kill not banned as pets? They are no ordinary dog and should be treated with the respect they deserve. Here are some additional reasons for these dogs to be classified similarly to a dangerous wild predator:
  • Approximately every 21 days in the USA a human is killed by a Bully dog bred to kill.
  • Born with a genetic fault from cross-breeding they never emotionally mature beyond that of a teenager dog.  They are typically an energetic, sweet dog with an un-predictable attack trigger.
  • Currently many Bully breeds are banned or restricted by Insurance companies and airlines due to an unacceptably high risk for expensive claims.
  • Their approximate 540 lbs per sq inch in their bite along with their mouths designed to crush and rip, make them very similar to a wolf in their capability to severely maim and kill.
  • Rescue centers send new owners home with a ‘break bar’ to break their iron grip if they bite someone or something.  58% of dogs euthanized by shelters are bully breeds and their mixes.
  • Bred to be impervious to pain, un-predictable and relentless, a more dangerous characteristic than a wild predator animal whose very survival depends on their being mindful of pain etc.
Solutions for Public Safety
Rather than breed-specific legislation, classify the variety of breeds bred to kill as prima facie, a legally dangerous and vicious animal subject to the ownership, breeding and importing restrictions that we currently impose on dangerous and vicious wild animals. This is critical for these types of dogs' safety and appropriate treatment not to fall into the hands of amateurs.
Treat the owner of a dog bred to kill who attacks a person, livestock or pet as a ‘co-attacker’ and hold them criminally liable for the assault/battery and/or fatality and civilly liable for the damages both physical and emotional. Legally define what constitutes an attack.
Some additional requirements might include mandatory spay/neuter, microchip implants, liability insurance whether on or off the owner’s property and prohibiting anyone convicted of a felony from owning one.
Legally mandate in-escapable housing, minimums for liability insurance, ban them from certain public areas, require both muzzled and leashed where allowed, require current owners to have their dogs pass a recall and out test (come back & stop chase/attack) both on and off leash under typical stress and temptation like chasing a cat, car or child on a bike. Anything less and these owners inflict upon us, a LETHAL WEAPON NO ONE CAN CONTROL!
Establish hot-lines for anonymous tips of violations.
Immediately ban the breeding or importing of such dogs except as meets above requirements.
Just as it becomes more important to house train and obedience train a big dog than a toy dog, so it becomes more important to respect the capabilities of dogs bred to kill by imposing stricter requirements on their ownership, housing, training and liability than on dogs bred to retrieve or herd or simply be lap dogs.
Be pro-active about your safety and that of your family and friends by obtaining a weapon of defense of your choice like pepper spray or a taser or something else and practice using it.
Additionally, if you have a dog that has been bred to kill, err always on the side of extremely cautious, train it for re-call and out to perfection on leash and off, keep it muzzled and leashed when in the presence of the public and construct it’s housing to be inescapable.  That is, I believe, what a responsible owner of the dogs mankind created to kill would do, to protect people, other animals and the dogs themselves from grave consequences their heritage can impose.
And finally, post this everywhere, and press your legislators for constructive changes for safety.

18 comments:

  1. Hey! Been off my one surviving laptop for days minus about thirty second a day or two ago.

    I want to catch up with all the great posts you have here, and I never did get to re post the post I lost but...

    I'll start here. This is typical as for owners/advocates of pit bulls.

    If you Google Darla Napora (Her and her husband raised two pit bulls from puppies, were vocal advocates of the breed, members of BadRap, and one of them killed her when she was six months pregnant) you'll find all kinds of excuses for the pit such as, "she must have fallen and he was trying to save her", Then a friend said to me, "These dogs are VERY protective so he must have sensed the baby was coming and got jealous." HUH?? (dog speaking) 'I love you so much and I'm so protective of you that I'm gonna have to kill you because I am aware that at some point you are going to give birth...' WOW! Not only protective, but clairvoyant.

    Amazing dogs! Almost angelic. If you get dismembered, mauled disfigured or killed, obviously YOU brought it on yourself.

    Glad you posted that. I have my doubts that, like religion, anyone will listen but still the same...

    ReplyDelete
  2. We seem to agree about lots of things.

    I once told a pit bull owner I would not live in a neighborhood with a pit bull. She compared me to a racist. But I would just like to get thru the day without being attacked by a dog bred to kill.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thought I'd share this quote:

    There are degrees of victimization. Your arm doesn't have to be broken or your child's face mangled or your cat killed to be a victim of Pit Bulls. If you can't walk to your mail box without worrying about the neighbor's Pit Bull getting loose - you are a victim. If you are stopped at a red light and the car next to you has a Pit Bull berserking in the back seat because your peaceful dog has his head out the window and is enjoying the nice sunny day but you have to call him in and roll up the window - you are a victim. If you can't walk around the block without a weapon - you are a victim. If you can't get lost in your own little world dead heading spent blooms, you are a victim. (comment by Dawn James on http://thepitbullshow.blogspot.com/2012/04/when-its-lab-mix-its-still-pit.html

    btw, this article you posted is great!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks for this:http://thepitbullshow.blogspot.com/

    A few years ago in a park I saw a lady with a very small dog and not far away the owner of a pit bull was struggling to control his barking pet from attacking and killing her dog. No harm done but like you said she was a victim.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're welcome! Dogsbite.org is a great site as well but I think the best site out there is cravendesires.blogspot.com. Very intelligent, informative and I think on the snark they'd be right up your alley, lol.

      Delete
  5. I read recently that Fort Lauderdale, the largest city near where I live, bans pit bulls.

    I had no idea there are so many anti-dangerous-dog websites.

    From your excellent cravendesires.blogspot.com, I have to add this one to my list of favorite quotes because it describes creationists perfectly.

    HE WHO KNOWS NOTHING IS CLOSER TO THE TRUTH THAN HE WHOSE MIND IS FILLED WITH FALSEHOODS AND ERRORS. THOMAS JEFFERSON

    ReplyDelete
  6. I love that quote, too. Good ol' Thomas J. Always good for a quote. A lot of Christians believe he was one too but I've read a lot of anti religion quotes from him so if he had any belief, he was probably just your basic run-of-the-mill theist that most were back then, but he certainly was a man of reason and no doubt would be an atheist if he lived in the age of science.

    The person that runs the craven desires blog is an atheist (love it!). I love reading on there and the comments are great too. A lot of intelligent people who know their stuff.

    I may have heard that Fort Lauderdale bans pit bulls. There are some cities that do but too few. The area where I live is loaded with these dogs and I feel the need to always be looking around when I'm walking anywhere around here which pisses me off.

    "I had no idea there are so many anti-dangerous-dog websites." I'm following four or five in my feeds but there are many. Some have been victims directly but some just see the reality of these dogs (and as you acknowledged see victims re-victimized by being blamed) and want laws put in place to protect the public. These maulings are a growing problem and it's good to know there are capable people out there fighting for the rest of us. Their fight isn't easy as the public has been so brainwashed by the pro pit advocates and their propaganda. It's mind boggling how people react if you say even the slightest negative thing about these dogs. It's so similar to the reaction from the fundies that it's quite fascinating, actually.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Another thing we agree about: "... he (Jefferson) certainly was a man of reason and no doubt would be an atheist if he lived in the age of science."

    If you ever create your own blog (and perhaps you should because you write really well) I would recommend it.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thank you so much! I appreciate that. My daughter was encouraging me to but my vocabulary is limited, I always over or under punctuate, and I have problems with conveying/relaying back information I take in. I understand something then go to relay it to someone and I sound like a moron. So writing is better for me (punctuation issues notwithstanding) because I can take my time and think and if I need to I double check a word to be sure I'm using it in the right context. Even still the thought of my own blog is scary. But maybe someday I'll get bold and do it. (I also have trouble keeping things short and to the point, my mind is a labyrinth, I have trouble navigating through it myself and don't know if I'd like to bring others in there, lol)

    I went on the Lady Atheist website. She is great! I'll be visiting her again for sure.

    btw, I am having trouble today with your blog. For some weird reason I can't click on any of the links after "Every religion claims to be the one true religion....." The others worked yesterday but not today. Everything prior to that is fine, just nothing after it. Could it be Blogger? I'm not having any other trouble except this.

    ReplyDelete
  9. There's probably a problem and it's probably my fault. I will investigate and fix it immediately. I appreciate your letting me know.

    Perhaps owning a blog is a bit too much work but it makes it possible for me to write anything I want without worrying about censorship.

    ReplyDelete
  10. TreeC, I can't find anything not working here. I'm not sure exactly what you meant by I can't click on any of the links after "Every religion claims to be the one true religion....."

    Would these be the posts, or the links in the right column under BLOG ARCHIVE or under THIS IS A LIST OF SOME OF MY FAVORITE POSTS:?

    If you could be more specific then I could find the problem. Thanks very much!

    Ms. Lady Atheist lives in beautiful Muncie, Indiana which has a serious Christian extremist problem.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Well, as an example when I tried the link for "Top Ten Reasons Why Religion is Bullshit", where it is blue I assume it to be a link. If I run the cursor over the blue letters they turn green so I know I can click on them to go to an article. I am not able to do that with anything, not even comments. I was able to go to the Lady Atheist link directly from my RSS feeds on My Yahoo but not from here.

    Hope that makes things a little clearer.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I tested those links and other links and everything works perfectly for me. I have a very old computer and when things are not working right I just restart my computer and then everything works fine. If necessary I will try using a different browser. Sorry you're having problems here.

    Before I changed careers I used to design and code computer software. Thank goodness I quit that stuff. I still have nightmares about it sometimes.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I noticed some browsers, for example FireFox, will update their software on everyone's computers to make an "improvement" that makes things worse. So perhaps using a different browser would solve the problem you're having with my blog.

    Just wild guessing here.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Rebooting should have been my first thought.I'm gonna try it and see if that fixes it. I could try it in Google Chrome rather than Firefox if not.

    Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Rebooted the laptop then went on Google Chrome instead of Firefox. Nothing is different. I asked my son to go on here to see if the problem was with my pc and the same thing happened from his laptop. Everything you posted subsequent to "Every Religion Claims...." will not work for viewing/posting comments. The only thing that did work was the youtube vid "Our Town".

    It's strange. Maybe some sort of glitch.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Also, the side links, for example under your favorite posts, DO work....It's just the most recent posts, probably from a day or two ago.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Hello TreeC

    I appreciate your helping me find the problem but I still can't reproduce the problem here. I tested every link starting with my most recent post and many posts after that and every single time it works perfectly for me. I'm using the Safari browser on a seven year old apple computer. Computers are very strange.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.